Filburn was penalized. 317 U.S. 111. Wickard v. Filburn (No. Wickard v. Filburn. 59) Argued: May 4, 1942. Decided: November 9, 1942. Syllabus; Opinion, Jackson; Syllabus. Legal/Courts. 43 F.Supp. 2. c. not only could Congress regulate interstate commerce, it could regulate … b. Congress had improperly used the interstate commerce clause.
1017, reversed. For those who have never heard of the case: An Ohio farmer, Roscoe Filburn, was growing wheat for use to feed animals on his own farm.
Wickard v. Filburn 1942 Roscoe Filburn V. Court unaminously votes against Filburn Farmer Owned cows, horses, and chicken Grew wheat "that a factor of such volume and variability as home-consumed wheat would have a substantial influence on price and market conditions. Start studying Amer Poly Sys midterm pt. He also cited the 1942 decision of Wickard v. Filburn to support the theory that market demands and the flow of the interstate economy would draw marijuana grown for medicinal use into channels for recreational use. He claimed that he wanted the wheat for use on his farm, including feed for his poultry and livestock. For example, the Supreme Court held in Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), that the federal government’s authority to regulate commerce across state lines was sufficient to justify a regulation restricting the amount of wheat a farmer could grow for personal consumption. Filburn (1942): Case Brief, Decision & Significance is a lesson designed to help you review more about: When the New Deal legislation was enacted The main issue in Wickard v. Filburn harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment. ____ 42. In Wickard v. Filburn, the Supreme Court decided that a. A farmer in Ohio, Roscoe Filburn, produced a greater quantity of wheat than what Congress had allowed under the Agricultural Adjustment Act. Posted on October 4, 2012 | Constitutional Law | Tags: Constitutional Law Case Brief.
He was given a wheat acreage allotment of 11.1 acres under a Department of Agriculture. Facts. Should it be repealed or revisited today? Congress had no authority to regulate commerce. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) An activity does not need to have a direct effect on interstate commerce to fall within the commerce power, as long as the effect is substantial and economic. In your opinion, was Wickard v. Filburn the right interpretation of the Commerce Clause? 1. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Congress passed the Agriculture Adjustment Act in 1938, which established a quota system for the amount of wheat that could be placed into “interstate commerce” between states and established penalties for violation.