Discover the latest Discussions, Reviews, Quotes, Theories, Explanations and Analysis of Looper (2012) below Hes good at his job until one target (Bruce Willis) makes him fail to complete an execution and now he has to finish the job before it is too late. I call these posts conjectures and not hypotheses because there's no fracture of evidence for their assertions. It's fine to have a conjecture, but it's irrational to assume it's valid. I also find the Bruce Willis characters' grief over dead wife, very moving--though disturbing that he kills young poeple candidates. When you really think about it, Looper was a terrible film that made absolutely no sense. This is another one of those questions Johnson had answered in his head but didn’t put in the movie. It was a confusing story about time travel and telekinesis set in the future that is strangely reminiscent of the past.
A place to discuss the movie Looper r/looper. (not sure about that part.) Mr. Johnson has left an entire storyline off the trailers. hot.
Standing out amongst this years crop of mostly underwhelming sequels and comic book adaptations, Looper thunders onto the screen, showing, much like Inception did two years ago, that there is a place in 2012 for fresh material and just how good it can be when it's done right. We need you to answer this question! Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Joe in "Looper." First, there are some interesting posts on this forum that are funny conjectures. Perfect gray morality fits this tale of time-paradox well. Why was Looper considered a good movie? Please practice hand-washing and social distancing, and check out our resources for adapting to these times. Looper was a good movie with a lot of theoretical possibilities. I’m not the first person to write about the problems with Looper, the Internet is littered with articles outlining why the… Stay safe and healthy. Looper Critics Consensus. Rian Johnson's "Looper," a smart and tricky sci-fi story, sidesteps the paradoxes of time travel by embracing them. Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, and Emily Blunt star in LOOPER, a time-travel thriller about a mob killer from the future. ... but the Mother's love, and looper's sacrifice, brings him back. So when we actually watch the movie we’re seeing something fresh, untainted by trailer-blab. That’s what gives this movie distinction. So much so, that you don’t even need to go watch the movie. This film leads to a startling conclusion that wipes out the story's paradoxes so neatly it's as if it never happened.
As thought-provoking as it is thrilling, Looper delivers an uncommonly smart, bravely original blend of futuristic sci-fi and good old-fashioned action. ★★★★ Stronger as a psychological thriller than as an action movie, but is sure does delve into the complex quandaries of the characters.
Looper (2012) (movie): In 2074, when the mob wants to get rid of someone, the target is sent into the past, where a hired gun awaits - someone like Joe - who one day learns the mob wants to 'close the loop' by sending back Joe's future self for assassination. Why is it essential for a looper to close his own loop? Sitting here the day after viewing Rian Johnson's Looper, parts of it are still falling in to place. Popular on Rolling Stone Asked by Ursula Block. Most time travel movies run into trouble in the final scenes, when impossibilities pile up one upon another. Join. 6. Lacing tremendously exciting action with touching gravity, Looper hits you like a shot in the heart. He’s also held back information about Joe. Looper is a sci fi action thriller movie about a young hitman (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) who's targets are forced to travel back in time to be executed by him in a designated place at a designated time. This is definitely not the case with Looper. LOOPER Movie Trailer.